header-logo header-logo

15 June 2018 / Katherine Yap
Issue: 7797 / Categories: Features , Profession , Arbitration , ADR
printer mail-detail

Smart Maxwell: paving the way for ADR in Asia

Today, Asia is home to several prominent arbitral centres. With a growing number of parties worldwide opting for international arbitration, it has become increasingly important for arbitral centres to continually upgrade and improve their offerings in order to remain competitive and capture opportunities in alternative dispute resolution (ADR).

In Singapore, Maxwell Chambers announced its new Smart Maxwell initiative backed by the Ministry of Law. Maxwell Chambers will be equipped with smart technology by the end of the year, making it the world’s first smart hearing facility and placing Singapore at the forefront of the international ADR sector.

Smart Maxwell

Maxwell Chambers was officially established as an arbitration centre in 2010. It is the world’s first integrated dispute resolution hub, housing top international dispute resolution institutions as well as hearing rooms within the premises, for the convenience of visiting legal practitioners. Smart Maxwell entails the upgrading of our existing facilities, software and infrastructure, as well as the introduction of new features, to better serve the needs of our

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll