header-logo header-logo

28 February 2025 / Dr Tanya Garrett
Issue: 8106 / Categories: Features , Profession , Expert Witness , Family , Criminal , Mental health
printer mail-detail

Snakes in suits

209427
What is psychopathy & why does it matter? Dr Tanya Garrett explains the diagnosis & its implications for criminal & family proceedings
  • Psychopathy is a form of personality disorder characterised by emotional detachment and social deviance.
  • Understanding whether someone has psychopathic traits is important for considering parenting capacity, risk, and identifying what interventions are needed.

You might have seen the book Snakes in Suits by Paul Babiak and Robert D Hare. Sounds like a terrible pop psychology book, doesn’t it? In fact, Hare is the original author of the Psychopathy Checklist–Revised (PCL-R)—the ‘gold standard’ assessment for psychopathy that you’ll see used in psychological and psychiatric expert reports, where psychopathy is thought to be an issue.

The checklist has 20 items and is completed on the basis of an assessment and file review, often as part of a broader assessment of risk (of violence, sexual violence or domestic abuse). Sometimes the PCL-SV (Psychopathy Checklist–Screening Version) might be used when time is limited; I’ve used it when I suspected

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll