header-logo header-logo

29 October 2015
Issue: 7674 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Social mobility hit by legal aid cuts

Fewer opportunities than ever for lawyers without family wealth

Recent attacks on publicly funded law are not only a disaster for clients and lawyers but also for the hope of a more inclusive profession, according to the author of a recent report into social mobility and diversity in the legal profession,

The report, Opening up or shutting out? Social mobility in the legal profession, written by NLJ columnist and editor of The Justice Gap, Jon Robins, was compiled by Byfield Consultancy and Funke Abimbola, managing counsel at Roche UK. It reveals that, while 58% of trainees at the top 50 firms surveyed are female, the figure drops to 24% at partner level. Ten per cent of trainees are black and minority ethnic (BME) but that figure reduces to just four per cent among law firm partners.

“It is easy to see why aspiring lawyers from ordinary backgrounds are deterred from pursuing careers in the law”, writes Robins, in an article for NLJ. “The debate around social mobility in the law almost exclusively focuses on City firms. Yet it has been legal aid where many lawyers without family wealth typically begin their careers.

“There are fewer opportunities than ever because there is less work and that is largely, but not exclusively, the result of the crisis in legal aid.

“Increasingly young lawyers without family wealth are finding their entrance into the profession blocked.”

The report’s recommendations for the profession include: maintaining a set of key diversity data; committing to being transparent about the data; adopt social mobility targets rather than quotas; promote recruitment practices to broaden intake; adopt mentoring, sponsoring and early outreach programmes; and implement retention strategies such as support networks.

Funke Abimbola says: “Social mobility and diversity are some of the biggest issues facing the legal sector. From the most senior judiciary—there are no black, Asian or minority ethnic judges in the Court of Appeal or Supreme Court—to high street firms and universities, more needs to be done to push for access to this profession for all who are able.”

Issue: 7674 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll