header-logo header-logo

02 April 2015
Issue: 7647 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Social security

Smith v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2015] EWCA Civ 229, [2015] All ER (D) 204 (Mar)

The claimant appealed against the judge’s finding that the Jobseeker’s Allowance (Mandatory Work Activity Scheme) Regulations 2011 (SI 2011/688) were not ultra vires s 17A of the Jobseekers Act 1995. The Court of Appeal in dismissing the appeal, held that R (on the application of Reilly and another) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2014] 1 All ER 505, which quashed similar regulations, was not binding, as the present scheme contained some elements by way of “description”. Further, the Regulations prescribed a description of the scheme within the meaning of s 17A(1) of the Act.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—William Hallett & Lorna Scully

Anthony Collins—William Hallett & Lorna Scully

Anthony Collins hires two talented legal directors

Switalskis—five appointments

Switalskis—five appointments

Firm expands national abuse compensation team

Mathys & Squire—nine promotions

Mathys & Squire—nine promotions

IP firm announces new partners and senior promotions across UK offices

NEWS
A High Court ruling has sent a jolt through the legal profession after a newly qualified solicitor used an internal AI tool to produce court correspondence containing a fabricated legal citation
A significant data privacy ruling has clarified what counts as valid consent under UK data protection law
Executors may be overlooking billions of pounds in estate assets hidden in forgotten investments and misplaced share certificates
Britain’s booming non-surgical cosmetics market is operating in what some critics describe as a regulatory ‘Wild West’
Family contact disputes are becoming an increasingly prominent feature of Court of Protection litigation
back-to-top-scroll