header-logo header-logo

15 May 2012
Categories: Legislation
printer mail-detail

Social Security and Child Support (Supersession of Appeal Decisions) Regulations 2012 (SI 2012/1267)

These Regulations reinstate powers to change decisions made by the social security appeal tribunals and the Child Support and Social Security Commissioners before their functions transferred to the First-tier Tribunal and Upper Tribunals.

Commencement date
4 June 2012

Legislation Affected

SI 2001/1002, SI 1999/991, SI 1996/2907, SI 1992/1813 amended


Summary

Purpose

The Secretary of State, local authorities and the Child Maintenace and Enforcement Commission will now have the power to change decisions made under the old as well as the new regime.

Decision changes are usually made to reflect a change in the claimant’s circumstances since the tribunal made its decision.

Background

In November 2008 the Ministry of Justice legislated to abolish the social security appeal tribunals and the Child Support and Social Security Commissioners and transferred their functions to the new appeals system: the First-tier Tribunal and the Upper Tribunal.

While the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement (Transitional and Consequential Provisions) Order 2008,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll