header-logo header-logo

Social Security (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2012 (SI 2012/757)

20 March 2012
Categories: Legislation
printer mail-detail

Amend 14 instruments to clarify and update legislation or correct minor errors and omissions. One exception is the Second Chance Learning initiative which is a minor beneficial policy change.

Commencement date

Partly on 1 April 2012; Partly on 2 April 2012; Fully on 1 May 2012


Legislation Affected

SI 1987/1967, SI 1987/1968, SI 1996/207, SI 1999/991, SI 2002/1792, SI 2006/214, SI 2006/215, SI 2006/216, SI 2006/213, SI 2008/794 amended

Summary

Ensure that the definitions of Paternity Leave incorporate references to Ordinary and Additional Paternity Leave and Additional Statutory Paternity Pay in those Regulations. Introduce amendments to support the extension of the Second Chance Learning Initiative.

Include reference to claimants who are receiving the support or work-related activity component of Employment and Support Allowance in the definition of “chronically sick or mentally or physically disabled”, which applies to parents of young people in non-advanced education. Amend provisions relating to third party deductions so that claimants in Scotland who have difficulty paying

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll