header-logo header-logo

22 April 2016
Issue: 7695 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Solicitor

Purrunsing v A’Court & Co (A Firm) and another [2016] EWHC 789 (Ch), [2016] All ER (D) 95 (Apr)

The Chancery Division allowed the claimant’s claim against a solicitors’ firm and a conveyancing firm (HOC) that had acted for D. The claimant had purportedly purchased property from D which D had falsely represented as being his own. HOC had been in breach of contract and/or duty. Neither of the defendants had acted reasonably, and so they could not obtain relief under s 61 of the Trustee Act 1925. They had to bear equal responsibility.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Shakespeare Martineau—Molly Rae

Shakespeare Martineau—Molly Rae

Shakespeare Martineau boosts Sheffield corporate team with new appointment

Stone King—Clare Harris

Stone King—Clare Harris

Stone King appoints new head of trusts and estates to spearhead growth as expansion continues

Browne Jacobson—David Hill

Browne Jacobson—David Hill

Browne Jacobson appoints David Hill as new health and life sciences partner with UK and international experience

NEWS
The government is considering introducing a Serious Fraud Office (SFO) financial incentives scheme for individuals who report economic crime
Defendants will attend their first court hearing virtually via a secure link from a police custody suite, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has confirmed in its response to Lord Leveson’s independent review of the criminal courts
The Law Commission has proposed a major overhaul of product liability laws to bring them in line with the digital age and era of artificial intelligence (AI)
The Sentencing Council is consulting on three new and three revised guidelines for ‘Bladed article and offensive weapon etc offences’
The Ministry of Justice has laid secondary legislation to allow, for the first time, proceedings in the Administrative Court, a part of the King’s Bench Division in the High Court, and sentencing remarks by the Chief Magistrate to be broadcast
back-to-top-scroll