header-logo header-logo

A solicitor for a client

08 October 2010
Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

If a solicitor acts for himself on a claim, my understanding is that he is generally only entitled to litigant in person costs.

If a solicitor acts for himself on a claim, my understanding is that he is generally only entitled to litigant in person costs. Does that mean he cannot claim fixed solicitor’s costs on the claim form where, for example, he is suing for his professional fees?

CPR 48.6 makes it clear that a litigant in person for costs purposes includes a solicitor (and other legal representatives) who is acting for himself. But you have overlooked PD Costs para 52.5 which states that a solicitor who, instead of acting for himself is represented in proceedings by his firm or by himself in his firm name, is not, for the purpose of the CPR, a litigant in person. It follows, therefore, that a firm of solicitors claiming for their professional fees are not litigants in person and can claim costs in the same way as if they were acting for a client. 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The House of Lords has set up a select committee to examine assisted dying, which will delay the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
back-to-top-scroll