header-logo header-logo

A solicitor for a client

08 October 2010
Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

If a solicitor acts for himself on a claim, my understanding is that he is generally only entitled to litigant in person costs.

If a solicitor acts for himself on a claim, my understanding is that he is generally only entitled to litigant in person costs. Does that mean he cannot claim fixed solicitor’s costs on the claim form where, for example, he is suing for his professional fees?

CPR 48.6 makes it clear that a litigant in person for costs purposes includes a solicitor (and other legal representatives) who is acting for himself. But you have overlooked PD Costs para 52.5 which states that a solicitor who, instead of acting for himself is represented in proceedings by his firm or by himself in his firm name, is not, for the purpose of the CPR, a litigant in person. It follows, therefore, that a firm of solicitors claiming for their professional fees are not litigants in person and can claim costs in the same way as if they were acting for a client. 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Human rights lawyers, social justice champion, co-founder of the law firm Bindmans, and NLJ columnist Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC has died at the age of 92 years
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
back-to-top-scroll