header-logo header-logo

08 October 2010
Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

A solicitor for a client

If a solicitor acts for himself on a claim, my understanding is that he is generally only entitled to litigant in person costs.

If a solicitor acts for himself on a claim, my understanding is that he is generally only entitled to litigant in person costs. Does that mean he cannot claim fixed solicitor’s costs on the claim form where, for example, he is suing for his professional fees?

CPR 48.6 makes it clear that a litigant in person for costs purposes includes a solicitor (and other legal representatives) who is acting for himself. But you have overlooked PD Costs para 52.5 which states that a solicitor who, instead of acting for himself is represented in proceedings by his firm or by himself in his firm name, is not, for the purpose of the CPR, a litigant in person. It follows, therefore, that a firm of solicitors claiming for their professional fees are not litigants in person and can claim costs in the same way as if they were acting for a client. 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll