header-logo header-logo

17 May 2012
Issue: 7514 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Solicitor—Costs—Bill of costs

Minkin v Cawdery Kaye Fireman & Taylor [2012] EWCA Civ 546, [2012] All ER (D) 35 (May)

 

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Ward, Stanley Burnton and Elias LJJ, 1 May 2012

On the facts of the instant case, the client’s termination of the retainer absolved the solicitor from any further performance of the contract but it did not absolve the client from the payment of the costs properly incurred to that date.

Nicholas Bacon QC and Mark James (instructed by Routh Clarke, Leighton Buzzard) for the client. Bernard Livesey QC and Joshua Munro (instructed by Cawdery Kaye Fireman & Taylor) for the firm.

In June 2011, the claimant client provided instructions to the defendant law firm to act for him in divorce proceedings. The client’s wife had brought proceedings in the county court for a non-molestation injunction and an ouster order to exclude him from the former matrimonial home. The client was provided with a costs estimate in the amount of £3,500 plus VAT but was advised that costs estimates
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll