header-logo header-logo

17 May 2012
Issue: 7514 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Solicitor—Costs—Bill of costs

Minkin v Cawdery Kaye Fireman & Taylor [2012] EWCA Civ 546, [2012] All ER (D) 35 (May)

 

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Ward, Stanley Burnton and Elias LJJ, 1 May 2012

On the facts of the instant case, the client’s termination of the retainer absolved the solicitor from any further performance of the contract but it did not absolve the client from the payment of the costs properly incurred to that date.

Nicholas Bacon QC and Mark James (instructed by Routh Clarke, Leighton Buzzard) for the client. Bernard Livesey QC and Joshua Munro (instructed by Cawdery Kaye Fireman & Taylor) for the firm.

In June 2011, the claimant client provided instructions to the defendant law firm to act for him in divorce proceedings. The client’s wife had brought proceedings in the county court for a non-molestation injunction and an ouster order to exclude him from the former matrimonial home. The client was provided with a costs estimate in the amount of £3,500 plus VAT but was advised that costs estimates
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll