header-logo header-logo

12 May 2023 / Kris Kilsby
Issue: 8024 / Categories: Features , Profession , Costs , Legal services , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Solicitor fees & unwelcome surprises

121606
Provide clients with accurate costs estimates for administering estates, or risk a challenge from disgruntled beneficiaries, warns Kris Kilsby
  • Solicitors must ensure that accurate estimates for administering estates are provided and that beneficiaries are kept informed of the costs being incurred.
  • Failure to do so may leave solicitors open to challenges from unhappy beneficiaries and a reduction in costs recovered.

The decision of Costs Judge Brown in Kenig v Thomson Snell & Passmore LLP [2023] Lexis Citation 357 is an important one for all solicitors who practise in the administration of estates, as it may have opened the door for beneficiaries to bring applications under s 71 of the Solicitors Act 1974 (SA 1974).

The claimant and his sister were the sole beneficiaries of their late mother’s estate in this matter. The defendant solicitors were retained by the sole executor of the will and the deceased’s brother, who played no active part in the application.

There was a formal engagement letter between the executor and the defendant

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll