header-logo header-logo

12 May 2023 / Kris Kilsby
Issue: 8024 / Categories: Features , Profession , Costs , Legal services , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Solicitor fees & unwelcome surprises

121606
Provide clients with accurate costs estimates for administering estates, or risk a challenge from disgruntled beneficiaries, warns Kris Kilsby
  • Solicitors must ensure that accurate estimates for administering estates are provided and that beneficiaries are kept informed of the costs being incurred.
  • Failure to do so may leave solicitors open to challenges from unhappy beneficiaries and a reduction in costs recovered.

The decision of Costs Judge Brown in Kenig v Thomson Snell & Passmore LLP [2023] Lexis Citation 357 is an important one for all solicitors who practise in the administration of estates, as it may have opened the door for beneficiaries to bring applications under s 71 of the Solicitors Act 1974 (SA 1974).

The claimant and his sister were the sole beneficiaries of their late mother’s estate in this matter. The defendant solicitors were retained by the sole executor of the will and the deceased’s brother, who played no active part in the application.

There was a formal engagement letter between the executor and the defendant

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll