header-logo header-logo

14 September 2012
Issue: 7529 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Solicitor—Retainer—Termination of retainer

French v Carter Lemon Camerons LLP [2012] EWCA Civ 1180, [2012] All ER (D) 14 (Sep)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Lloyd, Stanley Burnton LJJ and Morgan J, 3 Sep 2012

A solicitor was entitled to a lien on a file in circumstances where the client, not the solicitor, had terminated the retainer.

Joshua Munro (instructed by HMA Law) for the claimant. The defendant appeared in person.

The claimant instructed the defendant solicitors to act for her in litigation against an insurance company (the insurance litigation). The defendant was instructed under the terms of a retainer, which included provision for the claimant to terminate the retainer, provision for the defendant to terminate with notice, and the defendant’s entitlement to assert a lien for unpaid fees. The claimant later complained about the conduct of the insurance litigation. A senior member of the defendant, S, met with the claimant to discuss her complaint. They considered the fact that a case management conference (CMC) was due to take place in the insurance litigation the following

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll