header-logo header-logo

Solicitor—Retainer—Termination of retainer

14 September 2012
Issue: 7529 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

French v Carter Lemon Camerons LLP [2012] EWCA Civ 1180, [2012] All ER (D) 14 (Sep)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Lloyd, Stanley Burnton LJJ and Morgan J, 3 Sep 2012

A solicitor was entitled to a lien on a file in circumstances where the client, not the solicitor, had terminated the retainer.

Joshua Munro (instructed by HMA Law) for the claimant. The defendant appeared in person.

The claimant instructed the defendant solicitors to act for her in litigation against an insurance company (the insurance litigation). The defendant was instructed under the terms of a retainer, which included provision for the claimant to terminate the retainer, provision for the defendant to terminate with notice, and the defendant’s entitlement to assert a lien for unpaid fees. The claimant later complained about the conduct of the insurance litigation. A senior member of the defendant, S, met with the claimant to discuss her complaint. They considered the fact that a case management conference (CMC) was due to take place in the insurance litigation the following

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll