header-logo header-logo

Solicitor—Retainer—Termination of retainer

14 September 2012
Issue: 7529 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

French v Carter Lemon Camerons LLP [2012] EWCA Civ 1180, [2012] All ER (D) 14 (Sep)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Lloyd, Stanley Burnton LJJ and Morgan J, 3 Sep 2012

A solicitor was entitled to a lien on a file in circumstances where the client, not the solicitor, had terminated the retainer.

Joshua Munro (instructed by HMA Law) for the claimant. The defendant appeared in person.

The claimant instructed the defendant solicitors to act for her in litigation against an insurance company (the insurance litigation). The defendant was instructed under the terms of a retainer, which included provision for the claimant to terminate the retainer, provision for the defendant to terminate with notice, and the defendant’s entitlement to assert a lien for unpaid fees. The claimant later complained about the conduct of the insurance litigation. A senior member of the defendant, S, met with the claimant to discuss her complaint. They considered the fact that a case management conference (CMC) was due to take place in the insurance litigation the following

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll