header-logo header-logo

Solicitors

16 February 2011
Issue: 7453 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Minkin v Cawdery Kaye Fireman & Taylor [2011] EWHC 177 (QB), [2011] All ER (D) 82 (Feb)

The defendant solicitors exceeded the fee estimate they had given the claimant, and the claimant refused to pay. The firm then stated that it would no longer act for the claimant. The claimant applied for a detailed assessment of the outstanding bills under s 70 of the Solicitors Act 1974.

The master found that the claimant had a reasonable justification for delaying payment, and that the termination of the retainer by the firm amounted to a repudiatory breach of contract. On appeal the court ruled that it could only interfere with the master’s decision if it was satisfied that his conclusion lay outside the bounds within which reasonable disagreement was possible. Solicitors could terminate a retainer for good reason and on reasonable notice.

At common law, it was not good reason that a client had not paid part of the profit costs as an ordinary claim or statutory appeal proceeded. If solicitors wrongly terminated on that basis they could not sue

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
back-to-top-scroll