header-logo header-logo

16 February 2011
Issue: 7453 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Solicitors

Minkin v Cawdery Kaye Fireman & Taylor [2011] EWHC 177 (QB), [2011] All ER (D) 82 (Feb)

The defendant solicitors exceeded the fee estimate they had given the claimant, and the claimant refused to pay. The firm then stated that it would no longer act for the claimant. The claimant applied for a detailed assessment of the outstanding bills under s 70 of the Solicitors Act 1974.

The master found that the claimant had a reasonable justification for delaying payment, and that the termination of the retainer by the firm amounted to a repudiatory breach of contract. On appeal the court ruled that it could only interfere with the master’s decision if it was satisfied that his conclusion lay outside the bounds within which reasonable disagreement was possible. Solicitors could terminate a retainer for good reason and on reasonable notice.

At common law, it was not good reason that a client had not paid part of the profit costs as an ordinary claim or statutory appeal proceeded. If solicitors wrongly terminated on that basis they could not sue

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll