header-logo header-logo

Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal doubles fine

17 November 2017
Issue: 7770 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

US firm Locke Lord has been fined £500,000—double the original £250,000 figure proposed in an ‘agreed outcome’ between the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) and the firm.

Locke Lord admitted four charges of failing to supervise a solicitor involved in investment schemes and failing to have effective systems and controls in place to enable it to identify and assess potential conflicts of interest It accepted that £21m had passed through client accounts in relation to the schemes.

Unusually, Andrew Spooner, Chairman of the Division of the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal that sat on the case (SRA v Locke Lord) issued a statement alongside the judgment, clarifying that the tribunal refused the ‘agreed outcome’ because it felt ‘the proposed fine of £250,000 did not reflect the seriousness of the matter’.

Spooner said he wished to clarify matters because ‘inaccurate and misleading quotations’ had emanated from the SRA.

The solicitor involved, Jonathan Denton, has not admitted the allegations and will appear before the tribunal at a future date.

Issue: 7770 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll