header-logo header-logo

30 July 2021 / Ruth Oyelakin
Issue: 7943 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Marriage law: something old, something new?

53770
It is high time for marriage laws in England & Wales to be brought up to date for the modern era, says Ruth Oyelakin
  • Current marriage laws in England and Wales are extremely out of date: a reform would grant couples greater choice within a simple, fair, and consistent legal structure.
  • Temporary measures have been introduced as a result of the pandemic to widen the choice of venues for legally recognised marriages, and the Law Commission has concluded a consultation on proposals for reform, so it is hoped that greater changes will be made in the near future.

The legal requirements for a valid marriage in England and Wales have been established since 1836. How and where marriages can take place has, and continues to be, tightly regulated. The current system is described as being confusing, archaic, and out of date.

While it is accepted that it is important to regulate marriages and for there to be formal requirements, the current requirements do not reflect modern life. They also

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
back-to-top-scroll