header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
30 July 2021 / Ruth Oyelakin
Issue: 7943 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Marriage law: something old, something new?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
53770
It is high time for marriage laws in England & Wales to be brought up to date for the modern era, says Ruth Oyelakin
  • Current marriage laws in England and Wales are extremely out of date: a reform would grant couples greater choice within a simple, fair, and consistent legal structure.
  • Temporary measures have been introduced as a result of the pandemic to widen the choice of venues for legally recognised marriages, and the Law Commission has concluded a consultation on proposals for reform, so it is hoped that greater changes will be made in the near future.

The legal requirements for a valid marriage in England and Wales have been established since 1836. How and where marriages can take place has, and continues to be, tightly regulated. The current system is described as being confusing, archaic, and out of date.

While it is accepted that it is important to regulate marriages and for there to be formal requirements, the current requirements do not reflect modern life. They also

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll