header-logo header-logo

13 April 2007 / Kevin Rogers
Issue: 7268 / Categories: Features , Media , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Spam nation

Anti-spam legislation needs further explanation and funding, says Kevin Rogers

According to an estimate by the European Commission published in November 2006, the cost of dealing with unwanted e-mails, commonly called spam, was around €39bn worldwide in 2005. The EU Directive (2002/58/EC) on the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector is arguably the key piece of anti-spam legislation. It was implemented in the UK as the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/2426) (the regulations) and came into force in December 2003.

The regulations have been criticised for the nature and definition of ‘consent’ under reg 22; the limited remedies under reg 30; and the somewhat limited enforcement of these provisions by the Information Commissioner. Despite the UK’s provisions, spam volumes are continuing to rise and, according to Spamhaus, the UK remains in the top 10 of countries ranked by ‘spam issues’. Until recently, the only successful case under the regulations was Nigel Roberts v Media Logistics UK (2005, unreported). Mr Roberts obtained £270

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

London corporate and commercial team announces partner appointment

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Firm names partner as London office managing partner

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Firm appoints new head of criminal litigation team

NEWS
Personal injury lawyers have welcomed a government U-turn on a ‘substantial prejudice’ defence that risked enabling defendants in child sexual abuse civil cases to have proceedings against them dropped
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
back-to-top-scroll