header-logo header-logo

Spam nation

13 April 2007 / Kevin Rogers
Issue: 7268 / Categories: Features , Media , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Anti-spam legislation needs further explanation and funding, says Kevin Rogers

According to an estimate by the European Commission published in November 2006, the cost of dealing with unwanted e-mails, commonly called spam, was around €39bn worldwide in 2005. The EU Directive (2002/58/EC) on the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector is arguably the key piece of anti-spam legislation. It was implemented in the UK as the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/2426) (the regulations) and came into force in December 2003.

The regulations have been criticised for the nature and definition of ‘consent’ under reg 22; the limited remedies under reg 30; and the somewhat limited enforcement of these provisions by the Information Commissioner. Despite the UK’s provisions, spam volumes are continuing to rise and, according to Spamhaus, the UK remains in the top 10 of countries ranked by ‘spam issues’. Until recently, the only successful case under the regulations was Nigel Roberts v Media Logistics UK (2005, unreported). Mr Roberts obtained £270

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Kadie Bennett, Anthony Collins

NLJ Career Profile: Kadie Bennett, Anthony Collins

Kadie Bennett, senior associate at Anthony Collins and chair of the Resolution West Midlands Group, discusses her long-standing passion for family law and calls for unity in the profession

Osborne Clarke—Lara Burch

Osborne Clarke—Lara Burch

Firm appoints new UK senior partner for 2026

Keoghs—Louise Jackson & Katie Everson

Keoghs—Louise Jackson & Katie Everson

Healthcare and sports legal team expands in the north west

NEWS
Lawyers and users of the business and property courts are invited to share their views on disclosure, in particular the operation of PD 57AD and the use of Technology Assisted Review (TAR) and artificial intelligence (AI)
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
back-to-top-scroll