header-logo header-logo

Split decision

24 March 2011 / Andrew Woods
Issue: 7458 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Andrew Woods reports on the vexed issue of split premises

The Gambling Commission reminded all licensed operators via a press release in January, that betting premises must offer betting as the primary gambling activity in line with the commission’s Licence Conditions and Codes of Practice (Supplement 4). The release came after the rejection of two betting premises licence applications by local councils, in which the commission made representations, with the aim of “establishing principle and precedents with regard to the provision of the primary gambling activity”.

The release offered further guidance on a subject which continues to cause much debate since the Gambling Act 2005 came into force on 1 September 2007, namely the vexed issue of “split premises”, which arises when an operator seeks to obtain more than one licence for gambling; either for the same type of gambling or a different type of gambling within what may, or may not, be described as the same building.

Any application for a premises licence must be considered in accordance with the relevant Codes of Practice and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll