header-logo header-logo

Splitting up

23 March 2012 / David Burrows
Issue: 7506 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family , Property
printer mail-detail
hires_2_4

David Burrows notes the complexities that surround the severance of joint tenancy

Two recent cases have illustrated the complexities of English property law where land is held jointly by co-owners (whether married or unmarried). Legal title is always held jointly; and the survivor will own the whole title. The beneficial interests can be severed so that the owners will generally have a half share each in the beneficial ownership of the property and in the proceeds of sale. On the death of one, the survivor holds the legal title alone. The severed beneficial interest vests in the dead owner’s estate: the survivor holds it in trust for the estate.

Title will normally be severed by written notice of severance (Law of Property Act 1925 (LPA 1925), s 36(2)); but Elements of Land Law by Gray and Gray, fifth edition (2009) (Gray) identifies six other methods of severance (in an area of law described by Gray as of “unnecessary complexity”: para 7.4.68). Those of immediate concern to the family lawyer will be: severance

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll