header-logo header-logo

Sporting chance

03 March 2011 / Cathrine Grubb
Issue: 7455 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Cathrine Grubb reports on when fun & games become a breach of duty

In the area of sports and recreation it has already been established that participants owe a duty of care to other participants and spectators. The legal duty owed to fellow participants is to exercise “all care that is objectively reasonable in the prevailing circumstances for the avoidance of infliction of injury on other contestants”: Caldwell v Maguire [2001] EWCA Civ 1054, [2001] All ER (D) 363 (Jun). The prevailing circumstances include the object of the contest, the demands made on its contestants, its inherent dangers, its rules, conventions and customs, and the standards of skill and judgment reasonably to be expected of the contestant. As was noted in the case of Caldwell, given the fast-paced nature of most competitive sports, a momentary lapse of skill or error of judgment made when subject to the stresses of competition is not enough to give rise to a breach of duty. In practice, the claimant is likely to have to show that the conduct

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll