header-logo header-logo

03 March 2011 / Cathrine Grubb
Issue: 7455 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Sporting chance

Cathrine Grubb reports on when fun & games become a breach of duty

In the area of sports and recreation it has already been established that participants owe a duty of care to other participants and spectators. The legal duty owed to fellow participants is to exercise “all care that is objectively reasonable in the prevailing circumstances for the avoidance of infliction of injury on other contestants”: Caldwell v Maguire [2001] EWCA Civ 1054, [2001] All ER (D) 363 (Jun). The prevailing circumstances include the object of the contest, the demands made on its contestants, its inherent dangers, its rules, conventions and customs, and the standards of skill and judgment reasonably to be expected of the contestant. As was noted in the case of Caldwell, given the fast-paced nature of most competitive sports, a momentary lapse of skill or error of judgment made when subject to the stresses of competition is not enough to give rise to a breach of duty. In practice, the claimant is likely to have to show that the conduct

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll