header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
25 March 2016 / Ben Savery , James Deacon
Issue: 7692 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , CPR
printer mail-detail

A spot test on strategy

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
001_nlj_7692_savery

James Deacon & Ben Savery set out the lessons to be learnt from recent Pt 36 case law

A raft of recent cases has underlined the importance of making Pt 36 offers that are strategic, timely and correctly formulated.

Question 1

Can you make an offer to settle for a percentage of liability that could never be awarded in practice and is there a minimum reduction you should make?

Answer: The High Court has clarified that you can make such an offer and a modest reduction may suffice.

In Jockey Club Racecourses Ltd v Willmott Dixon Construction Ltd [2016] EWHC 167 (TCC), [2016] All ER (D) 90 (Feb), the defendant agreed to design and build a grandstand at Epsom. The roof failed and was later found to be defective. The club issued proceedings for the costs of repair and business interruption. It later made a Pt 36 offer to settle liability at 95% of the damages “to be assessed”. Willmott Dixon did not respond. It was directed that there would be a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Walkers—Muriel Marseille

Walkers—Muriel Marseille

Ashurst's Chief Risk Officer joins Walkers

Excello Law—John Osborne

Excello Law—John Osborne

Northern family lawyer John Osborne joins Excello

mfg Solicitors—Rebecca Rogers, Kennedy Langley & Victoria Griffiths

mfg Solicitors—Rebecca Rogers, Kennedy Langley & Victoria Griffiths

Trio of promotions announced at Kidderminster law firm mfg Solicitors

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Company conspiracy clarified
A sole director can conspire with their own company for the purposes of the tort of unlawful means conspiracy, the High Court has ruled in a judgment with potentially wide implications for business disputes
NLJ this week: Home is where intent lies
The Court of Appeal has reinforced that domicile depends on intention rather than residence alone, in a significant post-Brexit ruling on cross-border financial remedy claims
NLJ this week: Farewell to Chancery
The Chancery Division's long history comes to an end this autumn as it is reborn as the Business and Property Division, prompting questions over whether the shake-up is really necessary
NLJ this week: Silence carries a price
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) continues to show that failing to disclose regulatory issues can attract harsher consequences than the original misconduct itself
NLJ this week: Costs sting after a courtroom gamble
Rejecting a generous settlement can prove an expensive mistake, as two recent high-profile cases demonstrate
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll