header-logo header-logo

21 June 2024 / John Gould
Categories: Opinion , Rule of law
printer mail-detail

Spot the judge

177934
By diluting the judicial title, we risk interfering with the administration of justice, argues John Gould

Until it was abolished by the Crime and Courts Act 2013, scandalising the judiciary was a criminal offence intended to maintain public confidence in judges and the administration of justice. Public confidence is not to be taken for granted. Research published in 2019 by the Sentencing Council suggested that only around half of people surveyed thought that the criminal justice system was effective or fair. Judges are sometimes subjected to unconstitutional and unwarranted attack, such as the notorious newspaper headline describing three judges as ‘enemies of the people’ in 2016, but a more subtle undermining of the special perception of judges may be developing, arising from the presentation of individuals as ‘judges’ who are not.

It has long been accepted that for the administration of justice to operate successfully, the right to use the title ‘solicitor’ or ‘barrister’ must only be used by people who are actually solicitors or barristers. It is, for example, an offence under s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Firm awards training contracts to paralegals through internal programme

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Private client disputes specialist joins commercial litigation team

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Cumbria firm appoints new head of residential property

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Family law must shift from conflict-driven litigation to child-centred problem-solving, according to a major new report. Writing in NLJ this week, Caroline Bowden of Anthony Gold outlines findings showing overwhelming support for reform, with 92% agreeing lawyers owe duties to children as well as clients
back-to-top-scroll