header-logo header-logo

Square pegs in round holes

22 May 2015 / Sian Thompson
Issue: 7653 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail
nlj_7653_thompson

The introduction of LLPs & ABSs has had unforeseen consequences for professional executors, says Sian Thompson

For over a century the legal structure of law firms was confined to sole practitioners and partnerships. When change arrived it has been recent and fast paced—in legal chronological terms at least:

  • 1890 The Partnership Act
  • 2001 Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) introduced
  • 2007 Alternate Business Structures (ABS) came into existence

Unsurprisingly, elements of the administration connected to these new forms of legal services have struggled to keep up with the legislative reforms.

The probate registry is no exception to this. The impact of LLPs upon probate practitioners was not addressed by the courts until 2006. An LLP is a legal personality separate from its members, but many standard will clauses appoint “the partners in the firm of”. Such was the will prepared in 1992 for Edith Rogers.

By the time of her death in 2003 her chosen law firm had merged to become part of an LLP. The Bristol Probate Registry refused to issue

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll