header-logo header-logo

SRA accepts Gus John racism report

04 June 2014
Issue: 7609 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Black and minority ethnic (BME) solicitors are disproportionately over-represented in the regulatory process but there is no evidence of direct discrimination, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has concluded.

The SRA this week issued its response to Professor Gus John’s Independent Comparative Case Review report, published in March. Broadly, the SRA has agreed with Prof John’s findings.

Prof John was appointed to carry out the review, after the Society of Black lawyers accused the SRA of institutional racism.

SRA Chief Executive Paul Philip says: “Professor John found no evidence of direct discrimination, but we are concerned about his findings of continuing disproportionality in regulatory outcomes for BME lawyers. We are committed to undertaking the work necessary to identify the underlying causes of that disproportionality and, where it falls within our remit, to address those causes.”

 

Issue: 7609 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dispute resolution team welcomes associate in London

Winckworth Sherwood—Kevin McManamon

Winckworth Sherwood—Kevin McManamon

Special education needs and mental capacity expert joins as partner

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll