header-logo header-logo

SRA ditches six year run-off

21 July 2017
Issue: 7755 / Categories: Legal News , Regulatory , Profession
printer mail-detail

Firms seeking to switch regulator should exercise caution before ditching their six-year run-off cover, a prominent insurance specialist solicitor has advised.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has decided to relax a rule requiring firms to have six years’ professional indemnity insurance cover in place if they change their regulator. Instead, the firm’s new regulator will be solely responsible for ensuring adequate insurance is in place for any future claims.

The SRA is currently working with approved regulators to agree a protocol that sets this out. The approval of the Legal Services Board is still required for the plan to take effect. The SRA has said it hopes to have this by 1 October.

Crispin Passmore, SRA executive director, policy, said: ‘There was overall support for our proposals to remove the obligation for run-off cover if a firm switches regulator.’

However, Frank Maher, partner at Legal Risk solicitors, urged firms ‘to consider carefully before they take advantage of the proposals, because other regulators’ compulsory cover is not as comprehensive as the SRA’s Minimum Terms and Conditions.

‘So, for example, if a firm moves to the Council of Licensed Conveyancers and then hits on hard times and closes in the future, it will no longer have the SRA’s automatic six years’ run-off cover of £2m or £3m per claim plus defence costs, but a single, defence costs-inclusive limit of £2m’.

Maher said: ‘This is by no means academic, as my firm is currently advising partners in firms which have closed who face substantial property-related claims, and there are ex-partners who are having problems replacing run-off cover following the disclaimer of enterprise policies. So, I am not saying “don’t do it”, but they do need to understand the risks fully before making a move from which there may be no turning back.’

Issue: 7755 / Categories: Legal News , Regulatory , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll