header-logo header-logo

21 July 2017
Issue: 7755 / Categories: Legal News , Regulatory , Profession
printer mail-detail

SRA ditches six year run-off

Firms seeking to switch regulator should exercise caution before ditching their six-year run-off cover, a prominent insurance specialist solicitor has advised.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has decided to relax a rule requiring firms to have six years’ professional indemnity insurance cover in place if they change their regulator. Instead, the firm’s new regulator will be solely responsible for ensuring adequate insurance is in place for any future claims.

The SRA is currently working with approved regulators to agree a protocol that sets this out. The approval of the Legal Services Board is still required for the plan to take effect. The SRA has said it hopes to have this by 1 October.

Crispin Passmore, SRA executive director, policy, said: ‘There was overall support for our proposals to remove the obligation for run-off cover if a firm switches regulator.’

However, Frank Maher, partner at Legal Risk solicitors, urged firms ‘to consider carefully before they take advantage of the proposals, because other regulators’ compulsory cover is not as comprehensive as the SRA’s Minimum Terms and Conditions.

‘So, for example, if a firm moves to the Council of Licensed Conveyancers and then hits on hard times and closes in the future, it will no longer have the SRA’s automatic six years’ run-off cover of £2m or £3m per claim plus defence costs, but a single, defence costs-inclusive limit of £2m’.

Maher said: ‘This is by no means academic, as my firm is currently advising partners in firms which have closed who face substantial property-related claims, and there are ex-partners who are having problems replacing run-off cover following the disclaimer of enterprise policies. So, I am not saying “don’t do it”, but they do need to understand the risks fully before making a move from which there may be no turning back.’

Issue: 7755 / Categories: Legal News , Regulatory , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll