header-logo header-logo

25 February 2010 / Jonathan Karas KC
Issue: 7406 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

Standard bearers

Jonathan Karas QC outlines the desired qualities of expert witnesses

The law puts exacting standards on expert witnesses. The standards are high. This ensures that the courts can put trust in the experts but also that the public can have faith in the legal system in which they play a part.

The law and perceptions

To that end, expert witnesses (i) must be and be seen to be impartial and (ii) must provide independent assistance and unbiased opinions (National Justice Compania Naviera SA v Prudential Assurance Co Ltd (The Ikarian Reefer) [1993] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 68). The first requirement deals with the position of the expert. The second with what the expert must do in that position. There seems to be no more than a semantic difference between “impartiality” and an absence of bias.

The dangers of bias

Bias disqualifies a person from acting as an expert witness. The reason is that “[b]ias operates in such an insidious manner that the person alleged to be biased may be quite unconscious of its effect”

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll