header-logo header-logo

25 February 2010 / Jonathan Karas KC
Issue: 7406 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

Standard bearers

Jonathan Karas QC outlines the desired qualities of expert witnesses

The law puts exacting standards on expert witnesses. The standards are high. This ensures that the courts can put trust in the experts but also that the public can have faith in the legal system in which they play a part.

The law and perceptions

To that end, expert witnesses (i) must be and be seen to be impartial and (ii) must provide independent assistance and unbiased opinions (National Justice Compania Naviera SA v Prudential Assurance Co Ltd (The Ikarian Reefer) [1993] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 68). The first requirement deals with the position of the expert. The second with what the expert must do in that position. There seems to be no more than a semantic difference between “impartiality” and an absence of bias.

The dangers of bias

Bias disqualifies a person from acting as an expert witness. The reason is that “[b]ias operates in such an insidious manner that the person alleged to be biased may be quite unconscious of its effect”

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll