header-logo header-logo

24 July 2015
Issue: 7662 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

A stark contrast

nlj_7662_trask

How do you translate personal loss into a financial figure? Suzanne Trask highlights some inconsistencies & calls for change

Claims for compensation arising out of a person’s death are different from other personal injury claims. This is because the entitlement to claim is statutory, rather than based in common law. The estate has a claim on behalf of the deceased, under the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1934 (LR(MP)A 1934) as amended by the Administration of Justice Act 1982 (AJA 1982). A claim can be brought on behalf of the dependants of the deceased brought in their own right under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976 (FAA 1976) as amended by AJA 1982.

In contrast, claims where non-fatal injuries are suffered are for injuries and losses proved to have been incurred. The court hears the evidence on the extent of these, and compensation is assessed on a case by case basis. Where someone has suffered a life changing injury, awards can be for millions of pounds.

Claim by the estate

Claims under LR(MP)A 1934 by the estate

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll