header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
24 July 2015
Issue: 7662 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

A stark contrast

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
nlj_7662_trask

How do you translate personal loss into a financial figure? Suzanne Trask highlights some inconsistencies & calls for change

Claims for compensation arising out of a person’s death are different from other personal injury claims. This is because the entitlement to claim is statutory, rather than based in common law. The estate has a claim on behalf of the deceased, under the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1934 (LR(MP)A 1934) as amended by the Administration of Justice Act 1982 (AJA 1982). A claim can be brought on behalf of the dependants of the deceased brought in their own right under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976 (FAA 1976) as amended by AJA 1982.

In contrast, claims where non-fatal injuries are suffered are for injuries and losses proved to have been incurred. The court hears the evidence on the extent of these, and compensation is assessed on a case by case basis. Where someone has suffered a life changing injury, awards can be for millions of pounds.

Claim by the estate

Claims under LR(MP)A 1934 by the estate

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll