header-logo header-logo

28 January 2010 / Sarah Thomas , Ina Jahn , David Howell
Issue: 7402 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

State of affairs

The ECJ decision in West Tankers has been confirmed, say David Howell, Sarah Thomas & Ina Jahn

Following the landmark decision of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in West Tankers (Allianz SpA v West Tankers Inc C-185/07 [2009] (10 February 2009), the Court of Appeal has confirmed in its decision in National Navigation Co v Endesa Generacion SA [2009] EWCA Civ 1397, [2009] All ER (D) 179 (Dec) (21 December 2009) that a judgment given in EU member state court proceedings in which the subject matter falls within the Brussels Regulation (Regulation 44/2001 on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters) may be recognised in court proceedings in another member state, regardless of whether the latter proceedings fall outside the scope of the Brussels Regulation.

In the West Tankers decision the ECJ held that where a party brings court proceedings in an EU member state in breach of an arbitration agreement and the court determines that it has jurisdiction under the Regulation because the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
In this week’s NLJ, Fred Philpott, Gough Square Chambers, invites us to imagine there was no statutory limitation. What would that world be like?
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
back-to-top-scroll