header-logo header-logo

02 June 2011
Issue: 7468 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

State immunity—Definition of state—Immigration

Regina (HRH Sultan of Pahang) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 616

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, 25 May 2011, Maurice Kay, Smith, Moore-Bick LJJ

The question of the status of a person as a head of state enjoying state immunity is a matter for the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and not for the courts, and accordingly a certificate issued by the Secretary of State under s 21 of the State Immunity Act 1978 is conclusive evidence of the status of a territory for the purposes of Pt I of the Act.

Ian Macdonald QC and Aileen McColgan (instructed by Grange & Castle) for the claimant. Steven Kovats QC (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the defendant.

The claimant was the sultan of one of nine sultanates making up the Malaysian Federation. At the time of bringing of proceedings, he had not been the supreme head of the Federation for some years. A certificate (the certificate) had been signed by the Director of Protocol at

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll