header-logo header-logo

02 June 2011
Issue: 7468 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

State immunity—Definition of state—Immigration

Regina (HRH Sultan of Pahang) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 616

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, 25 May 2011, Maurice Kay, Smith, Moore-Bick LJJ

The question of the status of a person as a head of state enjoying state immunity is a matter for the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and not for the courts, and accordingly a certificate issued by the Secretary of State under s 21 of the State Immunity Act 1978 is conclusive evidence of the status of a territory for the purposes of Pt I of the Act.

Ian Macdonald QC and Aileen McColgan (instructed by Grange & Castle) for the claimant. Steven Kovats QC (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the defendant.

The claimant was the sultan of one of nine sultanates making up the Malaysian Federation. At the time of bringing of proceedings, he had not been the supreme head of the Federation for some years. A certificate (the certificate) had been signed by the Director of Protocol at

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll