header-logo header-logo

17 April 2015 / Frances Ratcliffe
Issue: 7648 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

State of play

nlj_april_17_ratclife

The latest developments in property cohabitation cases: where are we now, asks Frances Ratcliffe

In Stack v Dowden [2007] 2 AC 432, [2007] 2 All ER 929, the majority of the House of Lords disavowed the relevance of the presumption of resulting trust in cases concerning the beneficial interests in real property registered in the joint names of cohabitating couples for their joint occupation for domestic purposes. Rather, in the words of Baroness Hale, the search is to ascertain the parties’ shared intentions, actual, inferred or imputed with respect to the property in the light of their whole course of conduct in relation to it. Stack reiterated that the starting point in considering the apportionment of beneficial interests is that equity follows the law: so, in cases of sole legal ownership, the starting point is sole beneficial ownership, and in cases of joint legal ownership it is joint beneficial ownership. Moreover, cases of joint legal ownership where the beneficial interests are not shared equally will be “very unusual”. Stack was itself such a case,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll