header-logo header-logo

17 April 2015 / Frances Ratcliffe
Issue: 7648 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

State of play

nlj_april_17_ratclife

The latest developments in property cohabitation cases: where are we now, asks Frances Ratcliffe

In Stack v Dowden [2007] 2 AC 432, [2007] 2 All ER 929, the majority of the House of Lords disavowed the relevance of the presumption of resulting trust in cases concerning the beneficial interests in real property registered in the joint names of cohabitating couples for their joint occupation for domestic purposes. Rather, in the words of Baroness Hale, the search is to ascertain the parties’ shared intentions, actual, inferred or imputed with respect to the property in the light of their whole course of conduct in relation to it. Stack reiterated that the starting point in considering the apportionment of beneficial interests is that equity follows the law: so, in cases of sole legal ownership, the starting point is sole beneficial ownership, and in cases of joint legal ownership it is joint beneficial ownership. Moreover, cases of joint legal ownership where the beneficial interests are not shared equally will be “very unusual”. Stack was itself such a case,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll