header-logo header-logo

04 July 2014 / Tim Leaver , Nick Wright
Issue: 7613 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Status symbol

employmet_leaverwright

Tim Leaver & Nick Wright report on clarification from the Supreme Court that LLP members are workers

Employment law distinguishes between “employees” and “workers”, conferring extensive rights on employees (including the right to not be unfairly dismissed) but far fewer rights on workers. Generally, self-employed people who are in business on their own account and undertake work for their clients or customers fall within neither category, have no specific employment law rights and must instead rely on general statutes (eg in respect of health and safety) and common law rights in contract and tort to protect themselves when going about their business. In some cases, however, self-employed people will be considered to be “workers”. The question for the Supreme Court (SC) in Clyde & Co LLP and another v Bates van Winkelhof [2014] UKSC 32, [2014] All ER (D) 173 (May) was whether LLP members can claim this status.

Section 230(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 1996) sets out the definition of a “worker”. The first limb of that section

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

North West residential development team welcomes partner and associate

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
A landmark ruling has delivered the first judicial application of the UK’s anti-SLAPP regime and provided fresh guidance on abusive litigation
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
Non-court dispute resolution is no longer an alternative in family law—it is rapidly becoming the norm
back-to-top-scroll