header-logo header-logo

04 July 2014 / Tim Leaver , Nick Wright
Issue: 7613 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Status symbol

employmet_leaverwright

Tim Leaver & Nick Wright report on clarification from the Supreme Court that LLP members are workers

Employment law distinguishes between “employees” and “workers”, conferring extensive rights on employees (including the right to not be unfairly dismissed) but far fewer rights on workers. Generally, self-employed people who are in business on their own account and undertake work for their clients or customers fall within neither category, have no specific employment law rights and must instead rely on general statutes (eg in respect of health and safety) and common law rights in contract and tort to protect themselves when going about their business. In some cases, however, self-employed people will be considered to be “workers”. The question for the Supreme Court (SC) in Clyde & Co LLP and another v Bates van Winkelhof [2014] UKSC 32, [2014] All ER (D) 173 (May) was whether LLP members can claim this status.

Section 230(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 1996) sets out the definition of a “worker”. The first limb of that section

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

19 promotions across national offices, including two new partners

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Partner promoted to head of corporate team

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Chester office expansion accelerates with triple appointment

NEWS
As AI chatbots increasingly provide legal and commercial advice, English law is beginning to confront who should bear responsibility when automated systems get things wrong
Businesses are facing a ‘dramatic rise in prosecution risks’ as sweeping reforms to corporate criminal liability come into force, expanding the net of who can be held responsible for wrongdoing inside organisations
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has reignited debate over what exactly counts as the ‘conduct of litigation’ in modern legal practice
A controversial High Court financial remedies ruling has reignited debate over secrecy, non-disclosure and fairness in divorce proceedings involving hidden wealth
Britain’s deferred prosecution agreement regime is undergoing a significant shift, with prosecutors placing renewed emphasis on corporate cooperation, reform and early self-reporting
back-to-top-scroll