header-logo header-logo

Status unknown

08 February 2007 / Bruce Gardiner
Issue: 7259 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Despite the valiant efforts of judges, doubts persist about the true status of agency workers, says Bruce Gardiner

“There is confusion in the workplace and considerable uncertainty in the law about the status of individuals who obtain work through employment agencies.” So said Lord Justice Mummery at the start of his judgment in Dacas v Brook Street Bureau (UK) Ltd [2004] EWCA Civ 217, [2004] All ER (D) 125 (Mar). It is an important question. Recent Department of Trade and Industry figures suggest there are over 600,000 agency workers. Are such workers employees of the employment agency? Are they employees of the end-user client? Or are they not employees at all, with the result that they lack the legal protection afforded to employees?

Three years and three Court of Appeal cases later (see Dacas, Bunce v Postworth Ltd (t/a Skyblue) [2005] EWCA Civ 490, [2005] IRLR 557, [2005] All ER (D) 38 (May), and Cable & Wireless plc v Muscat [2006] EWCA Civ 220, [2006] All ER (D) 127 (Mar)) many practitioners felt that much of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll