header-logo header-logo

Statwatch

03 April 2008
Issue: 7315 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

News

Serious Crime Act 2007 (Commencement No 2 and Transitional and Transitory Provisions and Savings) Order 2008 (SI 2008/755) Commences 1 April 2008 and 6 April 2008. Commences provisions of the Serious Crime Act 2007 on 1 April 2008 which relate to the abolition of the Assets Recovery Agency and its director. Article 3 relates to the transfer of functions under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 in relation to Pt 5 (civil recovery), Pt 6 (revenue), Pt 8 (investigations) and s 3 (accreditation and training of civilian financial investigators). It ensures that the cases of the agency or its director in relation to those matters will be continued by specified successors. The successors are the National Policing Improvement Agency in relation to accreditation and training of civilian financial investigators and the Serious Organised Crime Agency for all other cases. Article 4 relates to the cases being dealt with by the Agency and its Director in relation to the confiscation of the proceeds of crime. It ensures that those cases will be continued by the Serious Organised Crime Agency. Brings into force certain provisions relating to serious crime prevention orders, certain amendments to the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, and an extension of powers of stop and search.

 

Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 (Commencement No 3) Order 2008 (SI 2008/749) Commences 6 April 2008. Brings the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007, s 141 into force on 6 April 2008. Section 141 relates to judicial review; it substitutes the existing section 31(5) of the Supreme Court Act 1981 and extends the power of the High Court in respect of quashing orders. The High Court will have the power to substitute its own decision for the decision of a court or tribunal in certain circumstances: where the decision maker is a court or tribunal, the decision is quashed on the ground that there has been an error of law and if the High Court is satisfied that it is the only decision the court or tribunal could have reached.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll