header-logo header-logo

24 April 2008
Issue: 7318 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Family , Community care
printer mail-detail

Statwatch

News

Criminal Justice Act 1988 (Offensive Weapons) (Amendment) Order 2008 (SI 2008/973) Commenced 6 April 2008. Adds certain swords, commonly known as “samurai swords”, to the Criminal Justice Act 1988 (Offensive Weapons) Order 1988 (SI 1988/2019). The effect of this is to make it an offence to manufacture, sell, hire (etc) these swords and to prohibit their importation, subject to an exemption for antique swords and certain defences.

 

 

Family Proceedings Fees Order 2008 (SI 2008/1054) Commences 1 May 2008. An incremental fee is introduced in relation to proceedings for a care or supervision order under the Children Act 1989, s 31. The first fee (£2,225) is paid on an application for such an order. The second fee (£700) is payable if an issues resolution hearing or pre-hearing review is listed, at least 14 days before the day on which the hearing is listed, and the third fee (£1,900) is payable if a final hearing is listed, at least 14 days before the day on which that hearing is listed. Provision is made for a refund to be made if a final order is made at a case management conference or if a hearing which has been listed does not take place.

 

Early Removal of Short-Term and Long-Term Prisoners (Amendment of Requisite Period) Order 2008, (SI 2008/977) Commenced 7 April 2008. Amends the definition of “the requisite period” in the Criminal Justice Act 1991, s 46A(5) which is the period that must be served in prison before the Secretary of State can order that the individual concerned be removed from prison for the purpose of removal from the UK. Removes the requirement that a prisoner serving a sentence of between three and four months must serve 30 days before the prisoner can be removed from prison. Provides that a prisoner serving less than three years must serve one-quarter of the term before he can be removed from prison. Brings forward the time at which a prisoner serving a sentence of three years or over can be removed from prison.

Issue: 7318 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Family , Community care
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll