header-logo header-logo

24 April 2008
Issue: 7318 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Family , Community care
printer mail-detail

Statwatch

News

Criminal Justice Act 1988 (Offensive Weapons) (Amendment) Order 2008 (SI 2008/973) Commenced 6 April 2008. Adds certain swords, commonly known as “samurai swords”, to the Criminal Justice Act 1988 (Offensive Weapons) Order 1988 (SI 1988/2019). The effect of this is to make it an offence to manufacture, sell, hire (etc) these swords and to prohibit their importation, subject to an exemption for antique swords and certain defences.

 

 

Family Proceedings Fees Order 2008 (SI 2008/1054) Commences 1 May 2008. An incremental fee is introduced in relation to proceedings for a care or supervision order under the Children Act 1989, s 31. The first fee (£2,225) is paid on an application for such an order. The second fee (£700) is payable if an issues resolution hearing or pre-hearing review is listed, at least 14 days before the day on which the hearing is listed, and the third fee (£1,900) is payable if a final hearing is listed, at least 14 days before the day on which that hearing is listed. Provision is made for a refund to be made if a final order is made at a case management conference or if a hearing which has been listed does not take place.

 

Early Removal of Short-Term and Long-Term Prisoners (Amendment of Requisite Period) Order 2008, (SI 2008/977) Commenced 7 April 2008. Amends the definition of “the requisite period” in the Criminal Justice Act 1991, s 46A(5) which is the period that must be served in prison before the Secretary of State can order that the individual concerned be removed from prison for the purpose of removal from the UK. Removes the requirement that a prisoner serving a sentence of between three and four months must serve 30 days before the prisoner can be removed from prison. Provides that a prisoner serving less than three years must serve one-quarter of the term before he can be removed from prison. Brings forward the time at which a prisoner serving a sentence of three years or over can be removed from prison.

Issue: 7318 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Family , Community care
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Elborne Mitchell & Myton Law

Weightmans—Elborne Mitchell & Myton Law

Firm expands in London and Leeds with dual merger

Boodle Hatfield—Clare Pooley & Michael Duffy

Boodle Hatfield—Clare Pooley & Michael Duffy

Private wealth and real estate firmpromotes two to partner and five to senior associate

Constantine Law—James Baker & Julie Goodway

Constantine Law—James Baker & Julie Goodway

Agile firm expands employment team with two partner hires

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll