header-logo header-logo

28 June 2018 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 7799 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Staying off the grass?

nlj_7799_backpage

Athelstane Aamodt puts the debate about the legalisation of cannabis in perspective

Canada’s recent decision to legalise recreational cannabis use and the case of Billy Caldwell, the British 12-year-old whose epilepsy is treated with cannabis oil, has meant that the debate about the legalisation of cannabis (and indeed drugs in general) has come to the fore once again. However, the criminalisation of cannabis is, when one looks at how long the plant has been cultivated and used by humans (which is as long ago as 8000BC), an undeniably recent phenomenon, regardless of whether one agrees or disagrees with its status as a controlled drug.

Medicinal use of cannabis by both the Greeks and the Romans was common. For instance, in the ‘Histories’ of Herodotus (484–425 BC), the Scythians are described as indulging in cannabis vapour-baths (the equivalent of a modern-day sauna).

Over the centuries the use of cannabis spread, and became commonplace in the Middle East and Persia. In 1619, hemp was being openly and legally grown on the banks of the Potomac in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

London corporate and commercial team announces partner appointment

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Firm names partner as London office managing partner

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Firm appoints new head of criminal litigation team

NEWS
Personal injury lawyers have welcomed a government U-turn on a ‘substantial prejudice’ defence that risked enabling defendants in child sexual abuse civil cases to have proceedings against them dropped
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll