header-logo header-logo

31 January 2008 / Hina Majid
Issue: 7306 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

A step too far

Special immigration status is highly objectionable, costly and unnecessary, says Hina Majid

A particularly obnoxious piece of legislation—Pt 12 of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill—is easing its way through the corridors of . Part 12 creates a special immigration status (SIS), which classifies its recipients as people without leave to remain in the , and prevents them from obtaining temporary admission.

 

Its bite, however, penetrates far more deeply, incapacitating its recipients through the indefinite denial of those basic rights most of us take for granted. The right to earn a living and to sustain a family home, to access mainstream housing or welfare benefits, to access most secondary healthcare, and all forms of further and higher education are all likely to be withdrawn as a result of the operation of the scheme. So, too, is the ability to secure residential stability though acquisition of settlement or British nationality for the SIS’s duration.

 

FOREIGN NATIONAL CRIMINALS

SIS can be applied to “foreign

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll