header-logo header-logo

20 February 2015 / Sara Wyeth , Anton van Dellen
Issue: 7641 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Stitched up?

wyeth

Manufacture at your risk, say Dr Anton van Dellen & Sara Wyeth

When a manufacturer supplies to a wholesaler, to what extent should the manufacturer be held responsible for events involving a wholesaler and an end-retailer? This question was considered by the Court of Appeal in the recent case of Confectia v Miss Mania [2014] EWCA Civ 1484.

Who bears the risk?

Confectia is a manufacturer of clothing based in Romania. It agreed to supply clothing to Miss Mania, a wholesaler based in the UK. Miss Mania proceeded to supply garments to a number of retailers, one of whom, Perera, refused to pay for the goods on the grounds of quality after delivery from Miss Mania. However, Miss Mania either took no steps or inadequate and insufficient steps to recover the goods from Perera and Perera was struck off almost a year later.

The issue before the court was whether the insolvency of a retailer was reasonably contemplatable as a serious possibility at the time of contracting within the rule in Hadley

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll