header-logo header-logo

20 February 2015 / Sara Wyeth , Anton van Dellen
Issue: 7641 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Stitched up?

wyeth

Manufacture at your risk, say Dr Anton van Dellen & Sara Wyeth

When a manufacturer supplies to a wholesaler, to what extent should the manufacturer be held responsible for events involving a wholesaler and an end-retailer? This question was considered by the Court of Appeal in the recent case of Confectia v Miss Mania [2014] EWCA Civ 1484.

Who bears the risk?

Confectia is a manufacturer of clothing based in Romania. It agreed to supply clothing to Miss Mania, a wholesaler based in the UK. Miss Mania proceeded to supply garments to a number of retailers, one of whom, Perera, refused to pay for the goods on the grounds of quality after delivery from Miss Mania. However, Miss Mania either took no steps or inadequate and insufficient steps to recover the goods from Perera and Perera was struck off almost a year later.

The issue before the court was whether the insolvency of a retailer was reasonably contemplatable as a serious possibility at the time of contracting within the rule in Hadley

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll