header-logo header-logo

Stop & search: widening the net?

18 November 2022 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 8003 / Categories: Features , Public , Criminal
printer mail-detail
100877
Neil Parpworth examines the stop & search provisions of the controversial Public Order Bill
  • Clause 10 of the Public Order Bill proposes a significant widening of stop and search powers by adding seven new protest-related offences.
  • Clause 11 seeks to confer on the police a new suspicionless stop and search power, while clause 14 makes it a summary offence for a person to intentionally obstruct a suspicionless stop and search, punishable by a potential prison sentence of up to 51 weeks.

At the time of writing, the controversial Public Order Bill (the Bill) passed all of its stages in the House of Commons and has received a second reading in the House of Lords. In the eyes of its critics, the Bill represents an unjustified and disproportionate interference with freedom of speech and the right to protest, as protected by Arts 10 and 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights. For the Johnson government which introduced it, however, it was claimed that the Bill ‘will enable [the] law-abiding

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Mourant—Stephen Alexander

Mourant—Stephen Alexander

Jersey litigation lead appointed to global STEP Council

mfg Solicitors—nine trainees

mfg Solicitors—nine trainees

Firm invests in future talent with new training cohort

NEWS
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
back-to-top-scroll