header-logo header-logo

18 November 2022 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 8003 / Categories: Features , Public , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Stop & search: widening the net?

100877
Neil Parpworth examines the stop & search provisions of the controversial Public Order Bill
  • Clause 10 of the Public Order Bill proposes a significant widening of stop and search powers by adding seven new protest-related offences.
  • Clause 11 seeks to confer on the police a new suspicionless stop and search power, while clause 14 makes it a summary offence for a person to intentionally obstruct a suspicionless stop and search, punishable by a potential prison sentence of up to 51 weeks.

At the time of writing, the controversial Public Order Bill (the Bill) passed all of its stages in the House of Commons and has received a second reading in the House of Lords. In the eyes of its critics, the Bill represents an unjustified and disproportionate interference with freedom of speech and the right to protest, as protected by Arts 10 and 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights. For the Johnson government which introduced it, however, it was claimed that the Bill ‘will enable [the] law-abiding

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll