header-logo header-logo

18 November 2022 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 8003 / Categories: Features , Public , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Stop & search: widening the net?

100877
Neil Parpworth examines the stop & search provisions of the controversial Public Order Bill
  • Clause 10 of the Public Order Bill proposes a significant widening of stop and search powers by adding seven new protest-related offences.
  • Clause 11 seeks to confer on the police a new suspicionless stop and search power, while clause 14 makes it a summary offence for a person to intentionally obstruct a suspicionless stop and search, punishable by a potential prison sentence of up to 51 weeks.

At the time of writing, the controversial Public Order Bill (the Bill) passed all of its stages in the House of Commons and has received a second reading in the House of Lords. In the eyes of its critics, the Bill represents an unjustified and disproportionate interference with freedom of speech and the right to protest, as protected by Arts 10 and 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights. For the Johnson government which introduced it, however, it was claimed that the Bill ‘will enable [the] law-abiding

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll