header-logo header-logo

Stop & search: widening the net?

18 November 2022 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 8003 / Categories: Features , Public , Criminal
printer mail-detail
100877
Neil Parpworth examines the stop & search provisions of the controversial Public Order Bill
  • Clause 10 of the Public Order Bill proposes a significant widening of stop and search powers by adding seven new protest-related offences.
  • Clause 11 seeks to confer on the police a new suspicionless stop and search power, while clause 14 makes it a summary offence for a person to intentionally obstruct a suspicionless stop and search, punishable by a potential prison sentence of up to 51 weeks.

At the time of writing, the controversial Public Order Bill (the Bill) passed all of its stages in the House of Commons and has received a second reading in the House of Lords. In the eyes of its critics, the Bill represents an unjustified and disproportionate interference with freedom of speech and the right to protest, as protected by Arts 10 and 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights. For the Johnson government which introduced it, however, it was claimed that the Bill ‘will enable [the] law-abiding

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll