header-logo header-logo

27 June 2018
Issue: 7799 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Straight couple win civil partnership case

Opposite-sex couples are discriminated against because they cannot enter into a civil partnership, the Supreme Court has held.

Same-sex couples were given state recognition of their relationship for the first time in 2004, when the Civil Partnership Act came into force. However, they had to wait until the enactment of the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 before they could marry. Many civil partners have since converted their relationship status to marriage and the government is considering phasing out civil partnership.

However, opposite-sex couple Rebecca Hannah Steinfeld and Charles Robin Keidan wished to have a civil partnership. 

Five justices unanimously declared the denial of civil partnership incompatible with the couple’s Arts 8 and 14 ECHR rights, in R (Steinfeld and Keidan) v Secretary of State for International Development [2018] UKSC 32. 

Graeme Fraser, partner at OGR Stock Denton and Resolution spokesperson on co-habitation, said the decision ‘enables those couples more choice while affording them similar financial security to marriage’.

Issue: 7799 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Maguire Family Law—Jennifer Hudec, Ciara Florey, Alice Ferguson & Ruth Wynn

Maguire Family Law—Jennifer Hudec, Ciara Florey, Alice Ferguson & Ruth Wynn

Maguire Family Law announces partner promotion and new hires amid a record year for enquiries

Switalskis—Rebecca Parry & Hannah Gamble

Switalskis—Rebecca Parry & Hannah Gamble

Switalskis wills and probate team extends reach with two appointments

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll