header-logo header-logo

27 June 2018
Issue: 7799 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Straight couple win civil partnership case

Opposite-sex couples are discriminated against because they cannot enter into a civil partnership, the Supreme Court has held.

Same-sex couples were given state recognition of their relationship for the first time in 2004, when the Civil Partnership Act came into force. However, they had to wait until the enactment of the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 before they could marry. Many civil partners have since converted their relationship status to marriage and the government is considering phasing out civil partnership.

However, opposite-sex couple Rebecca Hannah Steinfeld and Charles Robin Keidan wished to have a civil partnership. 

Five justices unanimously declared the denial of civil partnership incompatible with the couple’s Arts 8 and 14 ECHR rights, in R (Steinfeld and Keidan) v Secretary of State for International Development [2018] UKSC 32. 

Graeme Fraser, partner at OGR Stock Denton and Resolution spokesperson on co-habitation, said the decision ‘enables those couples more choice while affording them similar financial security to marriage’.

Issue: 7799 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

London corporate and commercial team announces partner appointment

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Firm names partner as London office managing partner

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Firm appoints new head of criminal litigation team

NEWS
Personal injury lawyers have welcomed a government U-turn on a ‘substantial prejudice’ defence that risked enabling defendants in child sexual abuse civil cases to have proceedings against them dropped
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
back-to-top-scroll