header-logo header-logo

Straight couple win civil partnership case

27 June 2018
Issue: 7799 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Opposite-sex couples are discriminated against because they cannot enter into a civil partnership, the Supreme Court has held.

Same-sex couples were given state recognition of their relationship for the first time in 2004, when the Civil Partnership Act came into force. However, they had to wait until the enactment of the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 before they could marry. Many civil partners have since converted their relationship status to marriage and the government is considering phasing out civil partnership.

However, opposite-sex couple Rebecca Hannah Steinfeld and Charles Robin Keidan wished to have a civil partnership. 

Five justices unanimously declared the denial of civil partnership incompatible with the couple’s Arts 8 and 14 ECHR rights, in R (Steinfeld and Keidan) v Secretary of State for International Development [2018] UKSC 32. 

Graeme Fraser, partner at OGR Stock Denton and Resolution spokesperson on co-habitation, said the decision ‘enables those couples more choice while affording them similar financial security to marriage’.

Issue: 7799 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll