header-logo header-logo

Straight to the point

12 November 2009 / Martin Bonney
Issue: 7393 / Categories: Features , Profession , Technology
printer mail-detail

Intelligent new technology can streamline the e-disclosure process, says Martin Bonney

As lawyers know, in a typical disclosure exercise less than 20% of the documents reviewed are responsive to the case.

The standard approach has been to apply a few basic search terms and then review everything in a linear fashion, slowly weeding the pertinent material from the largely unresponsive whole.

The enormous growth of electronic business documentation, especially e-mail, has made this approach increasingly untenable, on the basis of cost alone.

Accordingly, the courts have begun to stress the importance of proportionality when it comes to the scope and cost of the disclosure exercise.

For lawyers, this brings its own risks—where should the line be drawn? How can lawyers demonstrate that their approach in limiting a review is defensible and has not unduly disadvantaged the other side?

From evolution...

It is here that technology has an increasingly important role to play. Recent years have seen the introduction of a number of new technologies to deal with the growing volume of documents.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll