header-logo header-logo

29 July 2010 / Juliet Carp
Issue: 7428 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Strapped for cash

What do the new EU bonus rules mean for business, asks Juliet Carp

On 30 June the EU dropped a bombshell on credit institutions and investment firms. It was announced that new proposals would “transform the bonus culture and end incentives for excessive risk taking”. The message from Arlene McCarthy, the rapporteur in charge of negotiations for the European Parliament, was blunt: “In the last two years the banks have failed to reform, and we are now doing the job for them.”

New rules will affect the timing of payment, form of delivery, and size of bonuses delivered to large numbers of employees working in the financial services sector.

Where can the new rules be found?

The rules are outlined in the proposed new Capital Requirements Directive (amending Directives 2006/48/EC and 2006/49/EC as regards capital requirements for the trading book and for re-securitisations, and the supervisory review of remuneration policies). The proposals could technically change before the directive is adopted, though this is unlikely (EU guidance will follow). EU member states will then need

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll