header-logo header-logo

30 October 2009 / Heather Platt
Issue: 7391 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Stress alert!

Heather Platt provides an update on stress related case law

Stress has been described by the Court of Appeal as “an excess of demands upon an individual in excess of their ability to cope” (see Hatton v Sutherland and other appeals [2002] EWCA Civ 76, [2002] All ER (D) 53 (Feb)).

Stress is not a psychiatric injury: however it can lead to feelings of anxiety and depression or exacerbate other conditions such as dyslexia or epilepsy. Employers should be aware that employees may become disabled for the purposes of Disability Discrimination Act 1995, s 1.

The Court of Appeal felt that there are no occupations which should be regarded as intrinsically dangerous to mental health. Further, an employer is entitled to assume that an employee is able to withstand the ordinary pressures of the job and is generally entitled to take what he is told by his employee at face value, unless there is a good reason to think to the contrary.

Case law

The starting point is LJ Hale’s now well known guidelines in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott strengthens social housing development offering with senior London appointment

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers strengthens Birmingham real estate team with partner hire

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan expands private client and regulatory teams with new legal directors

NEWS
A mood of cautious optimism has enveloped the criminal law sector following indications the Prime Minister may abandon planned jury reforms
Helping to source the services and providers you need
The Senior Courts Costs Office has clarified that judges conducting detailed assessment proceedings cannot order security for costs—a ruling that may leave successful parties exposed to further litigation expense
Rejecting a generous settlement can prove an expensive mistake, as two recent high-profile cases demonstrate
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) continues to show that failing to disclose regulatory issues can attract harsher consequences than the original misconduct itself
back-to-top-scroll