header-logo header-logo

Stress driving family lawyers out of profession

19 May 2021
Issue: 7933 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Profession , Mental health
printer mail-detail
One in four family lawyers is on the verge of quitting due to the pressure of work, according to a report on wellbeing in the profession.

The report, ‘Wellbeing in family law’, published this week by family lawyers group Resolution, includes alarming case studies such as that of a Western Circuit barrister who suffered almost total sleep deprivation for three weeks.

More than half of the 1,200 family practitioners surveyed said they have considered quitting in the past three years because of concerns about their wellbeing. At the time of the survey, 26% were actively considering leaving the profession.

The practitioners reported long working hours and heavy workloads while client expectations and the stress of working in isolation during lockdown have stretched them to the limit. Some 57% of practitioners work more than eight extra hours during the week. Almost all (88%) needed to work during annual leave and 64% of practitioners said they usually or always feel fatigued during the working day.

Of those considering leaving, 45% are junior practitioners, which raises the risk of a generational drain of talent. Junior practitioners have also missed out during the pandemic due to reduced opportunities to learn from more experienced lawyers.

While awareness of wellbeing has grown in recent years, 43% of practitioners still felt uncomfortable talking to their employers about work-related stress and pressures.

Juliet Harvey, national chair of Resolution, said: ‘If firms fail to embrace flexible working and better wellbeing support, I fear we could lose the next generation of family practitioners.’

Elizabeth Rimmer, chief executive at LawCare, which supported the research, said: ‘This report is a catalyst for action to start creating everyday habits in family law that support wellbeing, such as good supervision, training for managers, and creating a positive work-life balance.’

View the report at: resolution.org.uk/mywellbeing.

Issue: 7933 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Profession , Mental health
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll