header-logo header-logo

25 March 2010 / Michael Salter , Chris Bryden
Issue: 7410 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Stressed out

Michael Salter & Chris Bryden provide an update on workplace stress

Workplace stress is an all-too-common occurrence, which can have a significant effect on both physical and mental health. Defined by the Health and Safety Executive as “the adverse reaction people have to excessive pressures or other types of demand placed on them”, it is also a fertile source of litigation.

Workplace stress claims do not fall neatly into any particular discipline within the law. Certainly such claims can, and commonly do, give rise to capability dismissals, but in the employment field are more likely to be brought either as constructive unfair dismissals or disability discrimination claims.

Duty of care

Outside of the employment field, a claim for stress-related illness usually is brought in negligence, based upon the duty of care owed by employers to take reasonable steps to protect their employees.

Since 2002 the position relating to workplace stress has been relatively well established. In Sutherland v Hatton [2002] ICR 613 (CA) the Court of Appeal established a number of factors applicable

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll