header-logo header-logo

29 April 2026
Issue: 8159 / Categories: Legal News , Regulatory , Career focus , Training & education
printer mail-detail

Stricter regime on learning on the way?

Solicitors would be required to enter into ‘mandatory ethical discussions’ each year, under Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) proposals

These would take the form of ethical dilemmas and scenarios which they would ‘work through’ with other solicitors, according to an SRA consultation on continuing competence requirements, issued last week. They would also need to keep detailed notes of how they identified and met their learning and development needs, and sign a declaration to this effect. Where the SRA detected concerns over competence, solicitors would be asked to complete ‘specific learning and development’.

Currently, solicitors are not given hourly targets for professional development and are responsible for assessing their own competence. The SRA said it has identified shortcomings in how some solicitors and firms do this.

Aileen Armstrong, SRA executive director of strategy, innovation and external affairs, said: ‘Following engagement with the profession and others, we are proposing strengthening the requirements in some areas. This includes new arrangements to support solicitors to navigate ethical challenges.’

The consultation closes on 15 July.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll