header-logo header-logo

19 January 2017
Issue: 7730 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Strike out strikes back once more

The ancient jurisdiction to strike out a civil claim for want of prosecution seemingly disappeared in 1999 with the arrival of the Civil Procedure Rules, but it is now back “and with a vengeance”, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School writes in this week’s NLJ. Regan, who advised Lord Justice Jackson on his civil justice review, cites recent case law to illustrate the point that a claimant who launches litigation “is now, more than ever before, expected to get on with it”.

Issue: 7730 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll