header-logo header-logo

24 March 2023
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Training & education
printer mail-detail

Students to go head-to-head in mock trial competition final

This weekend, the Royal Courts of Justice will host the final of the National Bar Mock Trial Competition 2023, with hundreds of students from 22 schools across the UK due to compete.

On Saturday 25 March, schools will go head-to-head to prosecute and defend two cases tackling topical legal issues, in the first in-person final since the COVID-19 pandemic. 11 judges, including Sir Brian Leveson, will oversee each mock criminal trial and score the students’ performances,

The National Bar Mock Trial Competition was founded in 1989 by Young Citizens (formerly The Citizenship Foundation), and is backed by the Bar Council.

Bar chair Nick Vineall KC said: ‘The Bar Mock Trial competition is a truly wonderful initiative for school students, and it is a great way to attract the best young people to the Bar of tomorrow. I am delighted the Bar Council supports this project that provides practical experience and a real insight into our profession.’

Ashley Hodges, CEO of Young Citizens, said: ‘Legal literacy is at the foundation of a thriving democracy. With nearly 2/3 of us not knowing our basic legal rights, programmes like Mock Trial Competitions are a vital way for young people to develop this knowledge and other key life skills. We are so grateful that the finalist schools will get the chance to visit The Royal Courts of Justice in person again. It is inspiring experiences like these that truly light the spark of active citizenship in young people and resonate throughout their lives.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll