header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
26 February 2020
Issue: 7876 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Studio Open Day: Wednesday 25 March

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
Have you ever considered using video to build and strengthen relationships, grow new business or run training sessions for your staff?
Including video in your online presence has been shown to improve search rankings as well as increase audience engagement. Also, whilst there is a perception that making videos is expensive, the cost is likely to be less than you think.

Using its central London studios, located at 30 Farringdon Street, LexisNexis currently provides a customised and cost-effective solution to a range of leading law and accountancy practices, professional bodies, listed companies and charities. Recent projects have included producing a response to the Budget, a webinar on the IR35 changes to the tax treatment of contractors and a training video on unconscious bias.

If you would like to get a better idea of the services that we can offer, why not come to the open day we are holding on Wednesday 25 March? During the visit you will be able to see the facilities and discuss your requirements with our experienced studio team, who can offer you full technical support and will be on hand to guide you from inception through to delivery. 

We are running tours between 10:00 and 17:00. To reserve your place please contact Stephen Honey on 07780 227402 or stephen.honey@lexisnexis.co.uk

Issue: 7876 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Surrogacy children caught in succession gap
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
NLJ this week: Online safety law at a crossroads
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
NLJ this week: Do Mandelson and Mountbatten-Windsor meet the misconduct bar?
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
NLJ this week: Supreme Court unlocks ‘lost years’ windfall for injured children
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
NLJ this week: Finality trumps freedom in arbitration showdown
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll