header-logo header-logo

19 July 2018 / Amy Proferes
Issue: 7802 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Subscribe on the dotted line

Amy Proferes explains the lessons of the Paynes & the requirements for witnesses attesting a will

  • Looks at the case of Re Payne (Deceased).
  • The difference between signing and subscribing.
  • The importance of intention to sign.

​The recent Court of Appeal decision in Re Payne (Deceased) [2018] EWCA Civ 985 clarified a fundamental question about the requirements for formal validity of a will: must the attesting witnesses sign the will, or is it enough for them merely to write their names?

Section 9 of the Wills Act 1837 (as substituted by s 17 of the Administration of Justice Act 1982) requires that:

‘No will shall be valid unless—

(a) it is in writing, and signed by the testator, or by some other person in his presence and by his direction; and

(b) it appears that the testator intended by his signature to give effect to the will; and

(c) the signature is made or acknowledged by the testator in the presence of two or more witnesses present at the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll