header-logo header-logo

amy_proferes_7286

Amy Proferes

Barrister

Amy Proferes is a barrister at Serle Court (aproferes@serlecourt.co.uk; www.serlecourt.co.uk)

Barrister

Amy Proferes is a barrister at Serle Court (aproferes@serlecourt.co.uk; www.serlecourt.co.uk)

ARTICLES BY THIS AUTHOR
What happens when neighbours claim your tenants run a brothel? Amy Proferes looks at a recent case

Amy Proferes explains the lessons of the Paynes & the requirements for witnesses attesting a will

The inevitable lot of mankind? Amy Proferes on ‘mistake’ in Schedule 4 of the Land Registration Act 2002

Amy Proferes considers overriding interests, overreaching, & the perils of the ‘registration gap’

Amy Proferes provides an update on dispensing powers in building schemes

Amy Proferes discusses establishing rights of way & determining their scope

Show
8
Results
Results
8
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll