header-logo header-logo

16 September 2020 / Amy Proferes
Issue: 7902 / Categories: Features , Property , Landlord&tenant
printer mail-detail

A long lease breach? Be specific!

27508
What happens when neighbours claim your tenants run a brothel? Amy Proferes looks at a recent case
  • Marchitelli v 15 Westgate Terrace looks at leaseholder’s responsibility for tenant’s illegal activities.
  • Where brothel-running is alleged, the leaseholder (lessee) should take prompt action.
  • The landlord’s notice should be specific.


A landlord wishing to forfeit a long lease of residential premises faces a daunting procedural labyrinth. The usual statutory notice under s 146 of the Law of Property Act 1925 must be served, specifying the breach complained of but, pursuant to s 168 of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002, this may only be done if either the lessee has admitted the breach or 14 days have elapsed since a court or tribunal has finally determined that the breach occurred. The recent decision in Marchitelli v 15 Westgate Terrace Ltd [2020] UKUT 192 (LC) shows that, even if an application for determination is successful, the landlord may still not be in a position to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

London corporate and commercial team announces partner appointment

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Firm names partner as London office managing partner

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Firm appoints new head of criminal litigation team

NEWS
Personal injury lawyers have welcomed a government U-turn on a ‘substantial prejudice’ defence that risked enabling defendants in child sexual abuse civil cases to have proceedings against them dropped
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll