header-logo header-logo

A long lease breach? Be specific!

16 September 2020 / Amy Proferes
Issue: 7902 / Categories: Features , Property , Landlord&tenant
printer mail-detail
27508
What happens when neighbours claim your tenants run a brothel? Amy Proferes looks at a recent case
  • Marchitelli v 15 Westgate Terrace looks at leaseholder’s responsibility for tenant’s illegal activities.
  • Where brothel-running is alleged, the leaseholder (lessee) should take prompt action.
  • The landlord’s notice should be specific.


A landlord wishing to forfeit a long lease of residential premises faces a daunting procedural labyrinth. The usual statutory notice under s 146 of the Law of Property Act 1925 must be served, specifying the breach complained of but, pursuant to s 168 of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002, this may only be done if either the lessee has admitted the breach or 14 days have elapsed since a court or tribunal has finally determined that the breach occurred. The recent decision in Marchitelli v 15 Westgate Terrace Ltd [2020] UKUT 192 (LC) shows that, even if an application for determination is successful, the landlord may still not be in a position to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll