header-logo header-logo

08 July 2016 / Amy Proferes
Issue: 7706 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Above the local law

Amy Proferes provides an update on dispensing powers in building schemes

  • An analysis of building schemes, enforcing covenants & dispensing powers.

Building schemes, or schemes of development, developed as a result of the difficulties involved in enforcing restrictive covenants when plots are sold out of a larger estate. There are four possibilities (see eg Small v Oliver & Saunders (Developments) Ltd [2006] EWHC 1293 (Ch) at [27], [2006] All ER (D) 376 (May)):

a) The benefit of the covenants may be annexed to the vendor’s retained land, which decreases in size with each sale. Purchasers and their successors may only enforce covenants against earlier purchasers and their successors.

b) The covenants may be annexed to the entirety of the land unsold by the vendor, but not to parts of that land. The vendor alone may enforce the covenants against all the purchasers. If he disposes of the retained land he may expressly assign the benefit of the covenants to his transferee; if he does not do so, no one has the right

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott strengthens social housing development offering with senior London appointment

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers strengthens Birmingham real estate team with partner hire

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan expands private client and regulatory teams with new legal directors

NEWS
A mood of cautious optimism has enveloped the criminal law sector following indications the Prime Minister may abandon planned jury reforms
Helping to source the services and providers you need
The Senior Courts Costs Office has clarified that judges conducting detailed assessment proceedings cannot order security for costs—a ruling that may leave successful parties exposed to further litigation expense
Rejecting a generous settlement can prove an expensive mistake, as two recent high-profile cases demonstrate
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) continues to show that failing to disclose regulatory issues can attract harsher consequences than the original misconduct itself
back-to-top-scroll